Impact of Board Ownership Structure on Firm Value and Excessive Cash Holdings: Evidence from Pakistan

Authors

  • Mosab I. Tabash College of Business, Al Ain University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates Corresponding Author
  • Adel Ahmed Amity Business School, Amity University Dubai, Dubai International Academic City, United Arab Emirates Author
  • Linda Nalini Daniel Faculty of Business, Higher Colleges of Technology, United Arab Emirates Author
  • Yasmeen Elsantil Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Commerce, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47654/v27y2023i3p109-134

Keywords:

Board Ownership Structure, Firm Value, Excessive Cash Holdings, Corporate Governance, PSX

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the influence of board ownership structure on firm value and the management of excessive cash holdings.

Methods: Data from the financial statements of 72 Pakistani firms were collected and analyzed using a Fixed Effect Model (FEM).

Findings: The statistical analysis reveals a significant correlation between the board ownership structure and firm value, emphasizing the pivotal role of efficient management in enhancing firm value and optimizing the utilization of excess cash holdings. The study also demonstrates the significance of the coefficient of determination about board size and firm value.

Implications: Based on the findings, we recommend that companies actively promote diversity among board members, encompassing not only in terms of gender, age, and nationality but also in knowledge, skills, and information. Such diversity plays a crucial role in ensuring compliance with good corporate governance mechanisms and governance codes, offering valuable insights for firm managers seeking to optimize their firm's value. Additionally, we suggest that firms consider the sensitivity of their board ownership structure when making decisions regarding excessive cash holdings and firm value. This study's focus on board ownership structure, firm value, and cash holdings in Pakistan provides valuable insights that can inform decision-making theory, corporate governance decisions, and policy discussions, making it relevant to the broader field of decision sciences.

Novelty: While the study acknowledges the well-explored relationship between corporate governance and firm performance, it focuses explicitly on the impact of board ownership structure, highlighting the significance of understanding how the composition of boards, including ownership patterns, influences firm value and financial practices.

References

Abid, G., Khan, B., Rafiq, Z., & Ahmed, A. (2015). Theoretical perspectives of corporate governance. Bulletin for Business and Economics, 3(4), 166-175.

Alabdullah, T. T. Y. (2018). The relationship between ownership structure and firm financial performance: Evidence from Jordan. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 319-333.

Al-Sartawi, A. M. M., & Sanad, Z. (2019). Institutional ownership and corporate governance: evidence from Bahrain. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 101-115.

Ameer, R. (2012). Impact of cash holdings and ownership concentration on firm valuation: Empirical evidence from Australia. Review of Accounting and Finance, 11(4), pp. 448-467.

Arosa, B., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2013). The board structure and firm performance in SMEs: Evidence from Spain. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 19(3), pp.127-135.

Ashfaq, K., & Rui, Z. (2019). "Revisiting the relationship between corporate governance and corporate social and environmental disclosure practices in Pakistan", Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 90-119

Bajagai, R. K., Keshari, R. K., Bhetwal, P., Sah, R. S., & Jha, R. N. (2019). Impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on capital structure of Nepalese listed companies. In Business Governance and Society (pp. 399-419). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Boubaker, S., Derouiche, I., & Nguyen, D. K. (2015). Does the board of directors affect cash holdings? A study of French listed firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 19(2), pp.341-370.

Broll, U., Guo, X., Welzel, P., & Wong, W. K. (2015). The banking firm and risk taking in a two-moment decision model. Economic Modelling, 50, 275-280

Chan, W. K., & Chu, E. Y. (2022). The impacts of corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure on firm performance: A case study of Chinese dual-listed companies. Advances in Decision Sciences, 26(4), 98-126.

Chiu, J., Chung, H., & Hung, S. C. (2021). Voluntary adoption of audit committees, ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 57(5), 1514-1542.

Duru, A., Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2016). The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4269-4277.

Egozcue, M., Guo, X., & Wong, W. K. (2015). Optimal output for the regret-averse competitive firm under price uncertainty. Eurasian Economic Review, 5, 279-295

Farwis, M., & Azeez, A. A. (2019). Corporate Ownership Structure and Firm Risk: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Sri Lanka. Journal of Finance, 7(2), pp.72-81.

Fontaine, C., Haarman, A., & Schmid, S. (2006). The stakeholder theory. Edlays education, 1, 1-33.

Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.

Fuzi, S. F. S., Halim, S. A. A., & Julizaerma, M. K. (2016). Board independence and firm performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 460-465.

Ganguli, S. K., & Agrawal, S. (2009). Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: An Empirical Study on Listed Mid-Cap Indian Companies. IUP Journal of Applied Finance, 15(12).

Ganguli, S. K., & Guha Deb, S. (2016). Board composition, ownership structure and firm performance: new Indian evidence in a unique regulatory environment. Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: New Indian Evidence in a Unique Regulatory Environment (March 12, 2016).

Gill, A., Obradovich, J. D., & Mathur, N. (2015). Promoter ownership and corporate leverage: Evidence from Indian firms. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(3), 513-521.

Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385-404.

Guo, X., & Wong, W. K. (2019). Comparison of the production behavior of regret-averse and purely risk-averse firms. Estudios de Economía, 46(2), 157-171

Ha, P. (2016). Cash holding, state ownership and firm value: The case of Vietnam. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(6), 110-114.

Herachwati, N., Hilyan, Y., Lin, P. K., & Sulistiawan, J. (2023). Drivers to green human resources management (GHRM) implementation: A Context of Cement Industry in Indonesia. Advances in Decision Sciences, 27(2), 1-27.

Iftikhar, R. M. (2017). Impact of cash holding on firm performance: A case study of non-financiallisted firms of KSE. University of Haripur Journal of Management, 2(1), 189-199

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kalsie, A., & Shrivastav, S. M. (2016). Analysis of board size and firm performance: evidence from NSE companies using panel data approach. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 9(2), 148-172.

Khan, M., Srinivasan, S., & Tan, L. (2017). Institutional ownership and corporate tax avoidance: New evidence. The Accounting Review, 92(2), 101-122.

Khan, M. J., Kamran, M., & Imran, M. (2020). Impact of Ownership Structure and Board Composition on Firm Performance in the Banking Sector of Pakistan. Journal of Banking and Finance, 3(1), 1-11.

Khan, N., Abraham, O. O., Alex, A., Eluyela, D. F., & Odianonsen, I. F. (2022). Corporate governance, tax avoidance, and corporate social responsibility: Evidence of emerging market of Nigeria and frontier market of Pakistan. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1), 2080898.

Khoa, D. D., Anh, P. T. T., & Duyen, L. T. M. (2020). Testing trade-off theory between networking capital and firm value: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Annals of Financial Economics, 15(03), 2050013.

Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2014). CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256-286.

Lee, E., & Powell, R. (2011). Excess cash holdings and shareholder value. Accounting & Finance, 51(2), pp.549-574.

Lepore, L., Paolone, F., & Cambrea, D. R. (2018). Ownership structure, investors’ protection and corporate valuation: the effect of judicial system efficiency in family and non-family firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 22(4), 829-862.

Lim, J., & Lee, S. C. (2019). Relationship between the characteristics of CEOs and excess cash holdings of firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(5), pp.1069-1090.

Lin, Y. R., & Fu, X. M. (2017). Does institutional ownership influence firm performance? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 49, 17-57.

Lo, F. Y., Wong, W. K., & Geovani, J. (2021). Optimal combinations of factors influencing the sustainability of Taiwanese firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(5), 909-928

Lok, C. L., Chuah, S. F., & Hooy, C. W. (2022). The Impacts of Data-Driven Leadership in IR4. 0 Adoption and Firm Performance in Malaysia. Annals of Financial Economics, 17(03), 2250023.

Mahmood, F., Shahzad, U., Nazakat, A., Ahmed, Z., Rjoub, H., & Wong, W. K. (2022). The nexus between cash conversion cycle, working capital finance, and firm performance: Evidence From Novel Machine Learning Approaches. Annals of Financial Economics, 17(02), 2250014

Martín, C., & Herrero, B. (2018). Boards of directors: composition and effects on the performance of the firm. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 31(1), pp.1015-1041.

Muttakin, M. B., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm ownership and board characteristics. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.

Nassirzadeh, F., Askarany, D., & Arefi-Asl, S. (2023). The relationship between changes in corporate governance characteristics and intellectual capital. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(2), 133.

Nguyen, H. M., Vuong, T. H. G., Nguyen, T. H., Wu, Y. C., & Wong, W. K. (2020). Sustainability of both pecking order and trade-off theories in Chinese manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 12(9), 3883.

Nguyen, H. M., Wong, W. K., & Vuong, T. H. G. (2023). Market Capitalized Scale and Corporate Capital Structure—Evidence from CSI300’s Listed Firms. Annals of Financial Economics, 2350002

Nguyen, P., Rahman, N., Tong, A., & Zhao, R. (2016). Board size and firm value: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(4), 851-873.

Pan, Y., Huang, P., & Gopal, A. (2018). Board Independence and Firm Performance in the IT Industry. MIS quarterly, 42(3), 979-A7.

Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74-95.

Patel, M. A. (2019). Impact of board structure and firm performance on chief executive's compensation. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal (APMAJ), 14(2), 185-199.

Pham, Q. H., Ho, D., Khandaker, S., & Tran, A. T. (2022). Investigating the effects of Accounting Law on the Credit Rating Models using Artificial Neural Networks: a study in Vietnam. Advances in Decision Sciences, 26(4), 1-32.

Ramadan, A., & Safavi, H. P. (2022). Impact Of Strategic Management Practices on Organizational Performance: Empirical Studies of Selected Firms in Libya. Advances in Decision Sciences, 26(2), 1-17.

Rashid, A. (2018). Board independence and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 34-49.

Sasidharan, A., & Varghese, G. (2019). Impact of Ownership Structure and Board Characteristics on Firm Value: Evidence from China and India. IFMR Graduate School of Business Wp19-008 Version No, 1.

Schauten, M. B., Van Dijk, D., & van der Waal, J. P. (2013). Corporate governance and the value of excess cash holdings of large European firms. European Financial Management, 19(5), 991-1016.

Sheikh, N. A., & Khan, M. I. (2016). Effects of excess cash, board attributes and insider ownership on firm value: evidence from Pakistan. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 10(1), pp.29-39.

Shin, M., Kim, S., Shin, J., & Lee, J. (2018). Earnings quality effect on corporate excess cash holdings and their marginal value. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(4), pp.901-920.

Song, H. J., & Kang, K. H. (2019). The moderating effect of CEO duality on the relationship between geographic diversification and firm performance in the US lodging industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1488-1504.

Susilawati, D., & Rakhman, F. (2018). The Effect of Ownership Structure and Investor Protection on Firm Value: Analyst Following as Moderating Variable. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 19(1), 64-75.

Talab, H. R., Manaf, K. B. B. A., & Malak, S. S. D. B. A. (2018). Internal audit function, ownership structure and firm performance in Iraq. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(8), 2098-2102.

Tang, J. (2017). CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating roles of other executives and blockholding outside directors. European Management Journal, 35(3), 362-372.

Trang, L. N. T., Nhan, D. T. T., Phuong, D. N. T., & Wong, W. K. (2022). The Effects of Selected Financial Ratios on Profitability: An Empirical Analysis of Real Estate Firms in Vietnam. Annals of Financial Economics, 17(01), 2250006

Ullah, N., Mujtaba, A., & Aman, N. (2019). Does Corporate Governance and Islamic Label Mitigate Over Investment of Free Cash Flow? Evidence from Pakistan. NUML International Journal of Business & Management, 14(1), 156-171.

Ullah, S., & Kamal, Y. (2018). Corporate cash holdings and shareholder wealth: evidence from Pakistani market. Pakistan Business Review, 19(4), pp.978-994.

Uribe-Bohorquez, M. V., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2018). Board independence and firm performance: The moderating effect of institutional context. Journal of Business Research, 88, 28-43.

Usman, M., & Alam, H. M. (2020). Ownership Structure and Business Firm Value: A Study of the Non-financial Sector of Pakistan. South Asian Journal of Management, 14(1), 61-81.

Vu, M. C., Phan, T. T., & Le, N. T. (2018). Relationship between board ownership structure and firm financial performance in transitional economy: The case of Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance, 45, 512-528.

Wang, G., DeGhetto, K., Ellen, B. P., & Lamont, B. T. (2019). Board antecedents of CEO duality and the moderating role of country‐level managerial discretion: a meta‐analytic investigation. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 172-202.

Widagdo, A. K., Rahmawati, Djuminah, Arifah, S., Goestjahjanti, F. S., & Kiswanto. (2022). The Impact of Ownership Characteristics and Gender on Earnings Management: Indonesian Companies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(1), 17.

Yeung, D., & Wong, W. K. (2023). An informational theory of the dynamic value of the firm. Annals of Financial Economics, 18(01), 2250016

Yousaf, M. U., Khurshid, M. K., Ahmed, A., & Zulfiqar, M. (2019). Empirical investigation of relationship between research and development intensity and firm performance: The role of ownership structure and board structure. International Journal of Financial Engineering, 6(02), 1950016.

Zhou, Y., Dai, J., Farooq, U., Ahmed, J., & Sergeevna, K. N. (2023). National Culture as a Determinant of Corporate Capital Structure: Empirical Evidence from Three Emerging Economies. Advances in Decision Sciences, 27(2), 122-144.

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

I. Tabash, M., Ahmed, A., Nalini Daniel, L., & Elsantil, Y. (2024). Impact of Board Ownership Structure on Firm Value and Excessive Cash Holdings: Evidence from Pakistan. Advances in Decision Sciences, 27(3), 109-134. https://doi.org/10.47654/v27y2023i3p109-134